Expect More Rules and Less Discretion from the ‘New’ Fed
President Trump has the opportunity to overhaul the Federal Reserve by appointing new Fed governors who align with his administration’s views – namely that the current Fed suffers from regulatory over-reach and is less independent than ever.
President Trump is expected to appoint as many as five new Fed governors before his term’s halfway mark
A recast Fed will have less regulatory authority, exhibit more independence and be less politicized
Expect the “new” Fed to focus on financial-sector performance, follow rules set by Congress and emphasize transparency
The recent announcement of Vice-Chair Stanley Fischer’s impending retirement from the US Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors opens up another opportunity for President Donald Trump to recast the leadership of the central bank.
A key reason to make changes at the Fed would be to limit its discretionary powers, which now encompass monetary, fiscal, regulatory and supervisory policies. These powers grew dramatically over the past three decades, making the Fed the financial system’s most powerful discretionary authority.
The Trump administration wants to reduce the Fed’s regulatory authority
President Trump has the opportunity to appoint at least five new governors before his term is even half-completed. Mr Trump will likely look for candidates whose priorities align with his own:
Rolling back the Fed’s regulatory authority and enforcement.
Restoring the central bank’s independence within government.
Separating monetary policy – narrowly defined – from fiscal policy.
Advocating for a rule-based approach to the formulation and implementation of monetary policy, with a renewed emphasis on money-supply growth as well as interest-rate targeting.
Demonstrating sensitivity to the needs and challenges of regional and community banks.
Taking a pro-business approach consistent with the views of his administration.
The president may also prefer candidates who possess strong leadership skills and have senior-level experience at the Fed; his recent appointment of Jerome Powell as the next Fed chairman confirms this view. There is also an appointee awaiting US Senate confirmation who has long favoured less regulation: Randal Quarles, who is in line to be Vice-Chair for Regulation.
For more information, read President Trump to Jerome Powell: You’re Hired!
Among advisors with the ear of the Trump administration, the reduction of the Fed’s regulatory authority is a top priority. These advisors believe that the Fed suffers from regulatory over-reach that has extended the operations of the central bank well beyond its legislated missions – putting the US economy and financial system at greater risk. What’s more, analyses by administration staff and its trusted advisors conclude that the Fed may now be more politicized and less independent than it has been at any time in its history, with the exception of 1936-1951, when it lacked effective monetary-policy authority.
The problem with informal guidance and politicization
What makes the Fed such a political force is its ability not only to institute formal rules, but also to issue informal “guidance”. The problem with issuing guidance without firm and explicit rules is that it maximizes the Fed’s discretion while minimizing regulatory accountability.
Regulation via guidance also presents opportunities for misbehaviour. Without clear rules limiting political pressures, it is possible for regulators to cede ground to special-interest groups and their representatives.
A strong example of this kind of politicization can be seen in the Fed’s earlier involvement in “Operation Chokepoint”. Led by President Barack Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, this effort enlisted the help of Fed regulators to extend their regulatory powers (ie, by imposing higher capital requirements or withholding permission for transactions) to pressure banks into eschewing dealings with enterprises that the Obama administration found undesirable.
In a similar way, the discretionary powers given to the Fed to approve bank mergers on the basis of Community Reinvestment Act compliance produced trillions of dollars of risky mortgage originations by banks in the 1990s and 2000s. Knowingly or not, the Fed understated the risks and commensurate capital requirements associated with these mortgages.
What to expect from the new Fed
In response to regulatory over-reach, the partial loss of Fed independence and its politicization, expect the recast Board of Governors to push in 2018 and 2019 for the following changes:
The Fed will focus financial regulation increasingly on explicit objectives that relate directly to financial-sector performance.
The Fed’s regulatory authority will follow rules established by Congress and become increasingly subject to Congressional budgetary discipline. Clear rules will lead to greater discipline in the formulation and implementation of monetary and regulatory policies to insulate policy-makers from special-interest pressures and foster emphasis on long-run public policies.
More transparent regulatory standards will be formed and enforced, making regulators and supervisors more accountable to the public. Supervisors will remain vigilant to look for violations of the letter or the spirit of black-letter regulations despite the more relaxed regulatory stance.
The micro- and macro-prudential supervision of banks will continue, with special emphasis on avoiding micro-management of each bank’s business practices.
The elimination of the Fed’s holdings of agency mortgage-backed securities likely will occur at a faster pace than was outlined in the 2017 principles of balance-sheet normalization; this should extricate the Fed from direct incursion into fiscal-like policies.
Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Investments in commodities may be affected by overall market movements, changes in interest rates, and other factors such as weather, disease, embargoes and international economic and political developments. Investments in smaller companies may be more volatile and less liquid than investments in larger companies. Investments in emerging markets may be more volatile than investments in more developed markets. Dividends are not guaranteed. Bonds are subject to interest rate risk and the credit risk of the issuer. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.
The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted.
This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is used only as supporting material to the offshore investment products offered by commercial banks under the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations.
This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424, Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association]; and Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan.
China’s latest National Party Congress wasn’t the model of transparency, but the market appreciated the overall sense of political stability and policy continuity – and the clear vote of confidence for the continued leadership of General Secretary Xi Jinping.
General Secretary Xi is focused on bringing China "growth with stability" – and on strengthening his authority
Mr Xi’s “blueprint” for China touches on reforms and tighter environmental protections, which could have implications for investors
Post-Party Congress growth areas include electric vehicles, automation, IT infrastructure and medical services